The segment-to-decision map
A segment earns its place when a boundary changes work and leaves a trace.
| Boundary | Decision that changes | Evidence object | Expected trace | Failure mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promise | Which problem, use case, or value proposition is stated | Buyer need, use case, requirement, or outcome definition | Different promise or qualification rule | Different label, same promise |
| Service | Which onboarding, support, or response level is offered | Work type, urgency, capacity, or contractual requirement | Different service path or capacity use | Tier name with identical service |
| Price and terms | Which price, discount, credit, or contract rule applies | Cost, value, risk, regulation, or negotiation object | Different terms and realized economics | Tiering without a price decision |
| Owner | Who manages the relationship and decision | Authority, knowledge, risk, and continuity requirement | Account owner or decision path changes | Field ownership changes only in CRM |
| Route | Which direct, partner, or marketplace path is used | Access, margin, service, and relationship data | Different route economics or access | Channel label with same work |
| Retention | Which intervention or renewal path is triggered | Risk signal, cohort, contract, or observed behaviour | Different action and outcome window | Health colour with no intervention |
| Measurement | Which denominator and period define success | Unit, baseline, time window, and counterfactual | Comparable result or explicit unresolved status | Segment result cannot be compared |
Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.
Reference & Evidence
Source: Author's framework grounded in Stein, Smith, and Lancioni (2013) and Palmatier, Scheer, and Steenkamp (2007). Stein is conceptual; Palmatier et al. report relationship paths, not a segmentation taxonomy.
Each line is a claim from the register this journal publishes against, resolved from the register at build time.
- B The paper is conceptual and its object is the diffusion of a capability: "The development and diffusion of customer relationship management (CRM) intelligence in business-to-business environments" Stein, Smith & Lancioni. (2013) ·
SSL13-C1 - B The gap the paper names: management has "neglected to analyze this information across market segments, customer categories, and customer"-firm relationship forms, and its method aims at "an improved understanding of the in-forming process in the firm"'s dealings with clients and "the directionality of customer"-firm decision-making Stein, Smith & Lancioni. (2013) ·
SSL13-C2 - A The design is dyadic and triadic: "In a study of 362 buyer"-"salesperson dyads using triadic data (from buyer, salesperson, and sales manager)", and the construct is new: "only salesperson-owned loyalty, a newly identified construct, directly affects the more tangible seller financial outcomes of sales growth and selling effectiveness" Palmatier, Scheer & Steenkamp (2007), Table 3 ·
PSS07-C1 - A Stated intention, and the item says its own horizon: buyers "reported that they would try to shift an average of 26% of" their current purchases, the question being whether they would "try to shift to this salesperson"'"s new rep firm over the next 3 years?" Intention, not realised movement Palmatier, Scheer & Steenkamp (2007), appendix and p. 195 ·
PSS07-C2 - A The contrast is between the two loyalties, in the authors' words: "only salesperson-owned loyalty, a newly identified construct, directly affects the more tangible seller financial outcomes of sales growth and selling effectiveness" Palmatier, Scheer & Steenkamp (2007), Table 3 ·
PSS07-C3 - A The paper reports measured firm and interface levers that alter salesperson-owned loyalty and firm-loyalty paths Palmatier, Scheer & Steenkamp (2007), Tables 3 and 4 ·
PSS07-C4 - B A segment is operational only when its boundary changes a promise, service level, price or terms, owner or route, or retention action Author framework grounded in Stein, Smith and Lancioni and customer-relationship evidence ·
B09-C1 - B A segment label should be tested by the decision it changes and the cost or outcome that moves afterward, not by the label's descriptive appeal Author framework ·
B09-C2
Grades: A, verified against the printed page of the primary source · B, primary source, text layer only · C, authoritative secondary · D, reported.
Related exhibits
-
The quota-parent matrix
From the essay Quota attainment has more than one parent
-
The triadic loyalty decomposition
From the essay The retention number is measured from your side of the table
-
The objects behind preferred customer treatment
From the essay Preferred customer treatment is relative resource allocation