Reception
How the teaching lands.
The official IU course evaluation, plus students' own words about why the numbers look the way they do.
10 / 10
Instructor, overall
from every one of the 11 students9.9 / 10
Course, overall
across all 11 responses9.8 / 10
Exam preparation
across all 11 responses100%
Top marks: planning, in-person balance & mentoring
all three at 6.0 of 6.0 (n=11)Official IU course evaluation · Introduction to Growth Hacking · 2025 Q4 · 11 responses
The full picture
Every dimension, measured.
Dimensions on a 1–6 scale (6 = highest); summary scores on 1–10.
Selected: Instructor
In their words
What students say.
Anonymised from the same evaluation: the survey asks students not to name anyone.
Even though it was his first time teaching, he made the class remarkably structured and engaging. Learning was genuinely fun: you didn't just memorise dry facts, you actually understood the topics. He kept it both instructive and personal, and looked beyond the obvious.
Really hands-on lectures, tangible for us students, and he was always reachable for questions. A good mix of humour and professional delivery. It was fun!
The lecturer made the sessions very hands-on. The split between theory and practical exercises to deepen the material was, to me, ideal. Keep it up!
A very kind lecturer, strong subject knowledge, and a warm, clear delivery of the material. Good exam preparation with lots of real-world examples.
An approachable, understanding manner that makes him good at teaching, so it was easy to work together. Easy to follow, and everything was clearly explained.
Everything: the teaching has never been better.
Bring the question you're working on.
Guest lectures and talks.
A short note can outline the room, the topic and the timing.
Get in touch →