← Every exhibit
The Good-Better-Best packaging fence matrix
Examine how feature gating, capacity ceilings, and governance fences enforce tier separation across buyer archetypes.
| Packaging tier | Strategic objective | Buyer archetype | Typical fence mechanisms | Target Segment Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1: Good (Starter) | Frictionless market entry and adoption | Early-stage teams, individual practitioners | Core workflow utility, self-serve onboarding, strict volume caps | Low ACV, self-serve or high-velocity sales |
| Tier 2: Better (Professional) | Primary revenue engine and expansion hub | Growing mid-market teams, departmental units | Advanced automation, team collaboration, standard integrations | Core commercial market, inside sales motion |
| Tier 3: Best (Enterprise) | Surplus extraction and governance monetization | Multinational enterprises, regulated industries | SSO, SCIM, audit logging, custom SLA, dedicated CSM | High ACV, multi-threaded enterprise field sales |
| Modular Add-On Packs | Monetize specialized power requirements | Outlier accounts with bespoke compliance needs | Data residency, HIPAA/SOC2 packs, dedicated compute | Prevents tier clutter while expanding wallet share |
Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.
Reference & Evidence
Source: Author's pricing architecture framework grounded in product line versioning and price discrimination research from Zbaracki et al. (2004), Bruno et al. (2012), and Urbany et al. (1989).