← Every exhibit

Table Table 1 From the research bench

The premarket forecast method matrix

A premarket forecast becomes more useful when every method has an observed object, a blind spot, and a decision use.

Method lensWhat it observesUseful outputWhat it missesDecision use
Market boundary and potentialMarket definition, category structure, proxies, and comparable demandA bounded opportunity envelopeFirm adoption, availability, and executionIs the market worth sizing?
Choice and purchase potentialPreferences, attributes, prices, and stated or modelled choicesChoice probabilities and conditional demandWhether the product is available, understood, or deliveredWhich offer or feature should be tested?
Adoption and availabilityAwareness, timing, production, sales coverage, delay, and changing market statesA path over time rather than a static totalInputs and calibration for the local marketWhen must capacity and coverage be ready?
Novelty and learningCategory learning, engineering information, qualitative response, and judgementA conditioned go, improve, or stop viewGeneral accuracy outside the applicationWhat must be learned before launch?
Reconciliation and scenariosIndependent estimates, assumptions, and alternative statesA range with an explicit reconciliation ruleJudgement is still an assumption, not validationWhat should be committed, tested, or deferred?

Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.

Cite Embed

Reference & Evidence

Source: Thomas (1987), Urban, Weinberg, and Hauser (1996), Oren and Rothkopf (1984), Aydin, Kwong, Ji, and Law (2014), and Klinger (1977). Framework rows are the author's synthesis.

Each line is a claim from the register this journal publishes against, resolved from the register at build time.

  • B The three steps are Thomas's own: "defining a concept of market potential for the new product", independent operationalisations, and reconciliation. The reason he gives for the plurality: "Multiple methods help to ensure that what is measured is due to the phenomenon under study and not the method" Thomas. (1987) · NPM27-C1
  • B The decision the forecast serves is three-way in the paper's own words: whether "the really-new product would be a viable business ven"ture, whether to plan improvements, or whether "the firm should stop development", and it is reached because "the authors describe how one firm combines managerial judgment and state"-of-the-art market measurement Urban, Weinberg & Hauser. (1996) · NPM27-C2
  • B One case, and a named one: "the authors describe how one firm combines managerial judgment and state"-of-the-art market measurement to decide whether "the really-new product would be a viable business ven"ture Urban, Weinberg & Hauser. (1996) · NPM27-C3
  • B The path is enumerated in the paper: "This model accounts for differ""ences in customer awareness of different products, for differences in product announcement dates, for differences in product availability, for differences in marketing efforts, for customer inertia and for customer purchasing delays", applied in "a system developed for market analysis of high speed nonimpact computer printers" Oren & Rothkopf. (1984) · NPM27-C4
  • B The uncertainty the fuzzy model preserves is in the survey data itself: "a high degree of fuzziness always exists in the data obtained from conjoint surveys", and "ignorance of the fuzziness would lead to the over-estimation of market demands" Aydin, Kwong, Ji & Law. (2014) · NPM27-C5
  • B The effort depends on the product: "depending upon the type, age (well-established vs. new product), and use of the product involved, the approaches and avenues to be employed, and the data to be established may differ markedly from one product to another", and "the extent of research effort required is guided by an industrial product typology which is applied to an eight step approach" Klinger. (1977) · NPM27-C6
  • B A method matrix can assign each method an observed object, useful output, blind spot, and decision use Author framework in the premarket method matrix · NPM27-C7
  • B The evidence does not show that adding methods always improves forecast accuracy; it supports explicit purpose, reconciliation, and boundary conditions Author boundary grounded in the cited premarket sources · NPM27-C8

Grades: A, verified against the printed page of the primary source · B, primary source, text layer only · C, authoritative secondary · D, reported.

Related exhibits